Tag: Art. 3 Sec. 2
-
Supreme Court Review of State Court Decisions
Supreme Court Review of State Court DecisionsIn addition to the constitutional issues presented by § 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and subsequent enactments,1 questions have continued to arise concerning review of state court judgments which g…
-
Virginia v. West Virginia
The Problem of Enforcement: Virginia v. West VirginiaA very important issue in interstate litigation is the enforcement of the Court's decree, once it has been entered. In some types of suits, this issue may not arise, and if it does, it may be easily met. Thus, a judgment putting a state in pos…
-
Theory of Plenary Congressional Control
The Theory of Plenary Congressional ControlUnlike its original jurisdiction, the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is subject to "exceptions and regulations" prescribed by Congress, and the jurisdiction of the inferior federal courts is subject to congressional prescription. Addi…
-
Three-Judge Court Act
Three-Judge Court ActWhen the Court in Ex parte Young 1 held that federal courts were not precluded by the Eleventh Amendment from restraining state officers from enforcing state laws determined to be in violation of the federal Constitution, serious…
-
Ambassadors
Suits Affecting Ambassadors, Other Public Ministers, and ConsulsThe earliest interpretation of the grant of original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court came in the Judiciary Act of 1789, which conferred on the federal district courts jurisdiction of suits to which a consul might be a party. This legi…
-
Citizens
Controversies Between a State and Citizens of Another StateThe decision in Chisholm v. Georgia 1 that cases "between a state and citizens of another state" included those where a state was a party defendant provoked the proposal and ratific…
-
Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate JurisdictionIn Wiscart v. D'Auchy,1 the issue was whether the statutory authorization for the Supreme Court to review on writ of error circuit court decisions in "civil actions" gave it power to review admiralty cases.1171 A m…
-
Conflicts of Jurisdiction
Conflicts of Jurisdiction: Federal Court Interference with State CourtsOne challenging the constitutionality, under the United States Constitution, of state actions, statutory or otherwise, could, of course, bring suit in state court; indeed, in the time before conferral of federalquestion jurisdict…
-
Admiralty Cases
Cases of Admiralty and Maritime JurisdictionThe admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the federal courts had its origins in the jurisdiction vested in the courts of the Admiral of the English Navy. Prior to independence, vice-admiralty courts were created in the Colonies by commissions from the Eng…
-
Civil Cases
Jurisdiction Confined to Civil CasesIn Cohens v. Virginia, 1 there is a dictum to the effect that the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court does not include suits between a state and its own citizens. Long afterwards, the Supreme Court dismissed…
-
Jurisdiction of the Inferior Federal Courts
Jurisdiction of the Inferior Federal CourtsThe Framers, as we have seen,1 divided with regard to the necessity of courts inferior to the Supreme Court, simply authorized Congress to create such courts, in which, then, judicial power "shall be ve…
-
Injunctions
Federal Restraint of State Courts by InjunctionsEven where the federal anti-injunction law is inapplicable, or where the question of application is not reached,1 those seeking to enjoin state court proceedings must overcome substantial prudential bar…
-
Admiralty
Admiralty and Maritime CasesAdmiralty and maritime jurisdiction comprises two types of cases: (1) those involving acts committed on the high seas or other navigable waters, and (2) those involving contracts and transactions connected with shipping employed on the seas or navigable waters. In the fir…
-
Parens Patriae
The State as Parens PatriaeThe distinction between suits brought by states to protect the welfare of their citizens as a whole and suits to protect the private interests of individual citizens is not easily drawn. Thus, in Oklahoma v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry.,<a name=t1 href=#f1 target="_self&qu…
-
Congressional Control over Writs and Processes
Congressional Control Over Writs and ProcessesThe Judiciary Act of 1789 contained numerous provisions relating to the times and places for holding court, even of the Supreme Court, to times of adjournment, appointment of officers, issuance of writs, citations for contempt, and many other matters whi…