Elector Qualifications

Elector Qualifications

House of Representatives: Elector Qualifications

It was the original constitutional scheme to vest the determination of qualifications for electors in congressional elections 1 solely in the discretion of the states, save only for the express requirement that the states could prescribe no qualifications other than those provided for voters for the more numerous branch of the legislature. 2 This language has never been expressly changed, but the discretion of the states&emdash;and not only with regard to the qualifications of congressional electors&emdash;has long been circumscribed by express constitutional limitations 3 and by judicial decisions.4 Further, beyond the limitation of discretion on the part of the states, Congress has assumed the power, with judicial acquiescence, to legislate to provide qualifications at least with regard to some elections. 5 Thus, in the Voting Rights Act of 1965 6 Congress legislated changes of a limited nature in the literacy laws of some of the States,7 and in the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970 8 Congress successfully lowered the minimum voting age in federal elections 9 and prescribed residency qualifications for presidential elections,10 the Court striking down an attempt to lower the minimum voting age for all elections.11 These developments greatly limited the discretion granted in Article I, § 2, cl. 1, and are more fully dealt with in the treatment of § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

More about Elector Qualifications

Notwithstanding the vesting of discretion to prescribe voting qualifications in the states, conceptually the right to vote for United States Representatives is derived from the Federal Constitution,12 and Congress has had the power under Article I, § 4, to legislate to protect that right against both official 13 and private denial.14

Resources

References

This text about Elector Qualifications is based on “The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation”, published by the U.S. Government Printing Office.

[Footnote 1] The clause refers only to elections to the House of Representatives, of course, and, inasmuch as Senators were originally chosen by state legislatures and presidential electors as the States would provide, it was only with the qualifications for these voters with which the Constitution was originally concerned.

[Footnote 2] Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 171 (1875); Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277, 283 (1937). See 2 J. STORY, COMMENTARIES ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES 576-585 (1833).

[Footnote 3] The Fifteenth, Nineteenth, Twenty-fourth, and Twenty-sixth Amendments limited the States in the setting of qualifications in terms of race, sex, payment of poll taxes, and age.

[Footnote 4] The Supreme Court's interpretation of the equal protection clause has excluded certain qualifications. E.g., Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 (1965); Kramer v. Union Free School Dist., 395 U.S. 621 (1969); City of Phoenix v. Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970). The excluded qualifications were in regard to all elections.

[Footnote 5] The power has been held to exist under § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641 (1966); Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112 (1970); City of Rome v. United States, 446 U.S. 156 (1980).

[Footnote 6] § 4(e), 79 Stat. 437, 439, 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(e), as amended.

[Footnote 7] Upheld in Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641 (1966).

[Footnote 8] Titles 2 and 3, 84 Stat. 314, 42 U.S.C. § 1973bb.

[Footnote 9] Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112, 119-131, 135-144, 239-281 (1970).

[Footnote 10] Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112, 134, 147-150, 236-239, 285-292 (1970).

[Footnote 11] Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112, 119-131, 152-213, 293-296 (1970).

[Footnote 12] “The right to vote for members of the Congress of the United States is not derived merely from the constitution and laws of the state in which they are chosen, but has its foundation in the Constitution of the United States.” Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651, 663 (1884). See also Wiley v. Sinkler, 179 U.S. 58, 62 (1900); Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U.S. 487, 492 (1902); United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299, 315, 321 (1941).

[Footnote 13] United States v. Mosley, 238 U.S. 383 (1915).

[Footnote 14] United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299, 315 (1941).

Tables of Contents


Posted

in

,

by

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *