Consent of Congress

Consent of Congress

Interstate Compacts: Consent of Congress

The Constitution makes no provision with regard to the time when the consent of Congress shall be given or the mode or form by which it shall be signified.1 While the consent will usually precede the compact or agreement, it may be given subsequently where the agreement relates to a matter which could not be well considered until its nature is fully developed.2 The required consent is not necessarily an expressed consent; it may be inferred from circumstances. 3 It is sufficiently indicated, when not necessary to be made in advance, by the approval of proceedings taken under it.4 The consent of Congress may be granted conditionally “upon terms appropriate to the subject and transgressing no constitutional limitations.” 5 Congress does not, by giving its consent to a compact, relinquish or restrict its own powers, as for example, its power to regulate interstate commerce.6

Resources

References

This text about Consent of Congress is based on “The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation”, published by the U.S. Government Printing Office.

[Footnote 1] Green v. Biddle, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 1, 85 (1823).

[Footnote 2] Virginia v. Tennessee, 148 U.S. 503 (1893).

[Footnote 3] Virginia v. West Virginia, 78 U.S. (11 Wall.) 39 (1871).

[Footnote 4] Wharton v. Wise, 153 U.S. 155, 173 (1894).

[Footnote 5] James v. Dravo Contracting Co., 302 U.S. 134 (1937). See also Arizona v. California, 292 U.S. 341, 345 (1934). When it approved the New York-New Jersey Waterfront Compact, 67 Stat. 541, Congress, for the first time, expressly gave its consent to the subsequent adoption of implementing legislation by the participating states. DeVeau v. Braisted, 363 U.S. 144, 145 (1960).

[Footnote 6] Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co., 59 U.S. (18 How.) 421, 433 (1856).

Tables of Contents


Posted

in

,

by

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *